easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
At a large firm, employees who eat lunch at their desks are, on average, more productive during the afternoon than employees who leave the building for lunch. A consultant concluded that eating lunch at one's desk boosts afternoon productivity.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consultant's conclusion?
- Lunches eaten at one's desk are usually less expensive than lunches eaten out.
- The firm's most ambitious employees tend both to eat at their desks and to work intensely throughout the day.
- Desk-lunch employees are assigned substantially lighter afternoon workloads than employees who leave the building, because managers reserve the more complex assignments for employees who leave the building at lunch.
- Employees who eat at their desks report feeling slightly more rushed than those who leave the building.
- Among employees equally ambitious about firm advancement, those eating at desks are still more productive during afternoons.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?