medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Students who participate in the high school's voluntary peer-tutoring program earn higher grades than students who do not participate. The principal concluded that the peer-tutoring program improves students' grades.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the principal's conclusion?
- With random peer-tutoring assignment, assigned participants earned higher grades than assigned nonparticipants.
- The peer tutors are themselves high-achieving students.
- Students joining peer tutoring tend to be more academically motivated than students who do not join.
- Grades across the school have risen modestly over the past several years.
- Assigned tutoring students knew their status and received additional praise from teachers throughout the term.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?