medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
If a government invests in education, its citizens' productivity will increase. If citizens' productivity increases, the country's GDP will grow. Therefore, a government investment in education is sufficient to ensure GDP growth.
Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the argument?
- A severe contraction in global trade can hold GDP flat or shrink it even while domestic productivity is climbing.
- The productivity gains from sustained investment in education frequently take many decades to become apparent.
- A few individual citizens fail to grow more productive even after benefiting fully from publicly funded schooling.
- Certain resource-rich nations achieve strong GDP growth despite spending very little of their budgets on education.
- Government investment in education is the single most reliable lever any nation can pull to expand its own economy.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ