medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Our six public declarations condemning oppressive regimes were each followed by violence within days. To minimize this violence, we should stop making such declarations.
Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the causal assumption on which the argument depends?
- Each declaration was issued only once it had already become certain that violence would erupt regardless.
- The violence that followed the declarations targeted government officials more than ordinary civilians.
- Several other countries issued their own condemnations of the same regimes during the same stretch of time.
- Wherever comparable circumstances arose but no declaration was made, far less violence ensued.
- Issuing such declarations is the chief cause of essentially all political violence in the region.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ