medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning

Our six public declarations condemning oppressive regimes were each followed by violence within days. To minimize this violence, we should stop making such declarations.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the causal assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Each declaration was issued only once it had already become certain that violence would erupt regardless.
  2. The violence that followed the declarations targeted government officials more than ordinary civilians.
  3. Several other countries issued their own condemnations of the same regimes during the same stretch of time.
  4. Wherever comparable circumstances arose but no declaration was made, far less violence ensued.
  5. Issuing such declarations is the chief cause of essentially all political violence in the region.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials