medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A fitness coach claims that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) always leads to greater fat loss than moderate-intensity steady-state cardio. The coach cites a study involving 50 participants.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the coach's claim?
- Many participants in the coach's study said they felt more energized and fit after their HIIT sessions.
- Sustaining high-intensity training over long stretches demands a great deal more motivation and effort.
- Steady-state cardio is often favored by older adults because it places less strain on the joints and heart.
- In a clinical trial, participants doing steady-state cardio lost noticeably more body fat than those doing HIIT.
- HIIT is so superior that steady-state cardio produces no fat loss for anyone under any circumstances.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ