medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A survey of commuters found that those who listen to audiobooks during their drive report lower levels of road rage than those who listen to the radio. The researchers concluded that the narrative engagement of an audiobook calms the driver's temperament.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the researchers' conclusion?
- Commuters who gravitate toward audiobooks tend by disposition to be more patient and less easily angered than drivers on the whole.
- Audiobooks can be costly, prompting many budget-conscious commuters to fall back instead on the free radio broadcasts they already receive.
- Following an intricate, multi-thread plot can occasionally pull a distracted driver's attention briefly away from the road ahead of them.
- Radio programming is peppered with frequent traffic bulletins and loud, abrupt advertisements that a good many listeners find jarring.
- Audiobook narration is delivered in a tone that stays consistently calmer and steadier than that of the average radio broadcast.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ