medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A survey of commuters found that those who listen to audiobooks during their drive report lower levels of road rage than those who listen to the radio. The researchers concluded that the narrative engagement of an audiobook calms the driver's temperament.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the researchers' conclusion?
- Commuters who gravitate toward audiobooks tend by disposition to be more patient and less easily angered than drivers on the whole.
- Audiobooks can be costly, prompting many commuters to fall back on free radio broadcasts.
- Following an intricate plot can occasionally pull a driver's attention away from the road ahead.
- Radio programming is peppered with frequent traffic bulletins and loud advertisements that some listeners find jarring.
- Audiobook narration is consistently calmer in tone than the average radio broadcast.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?