medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Most residents of the Oakwood neighborhood support the proposal to build a new park. Janice lives in Oakwood. Therefore, Janice probably supports the proposal.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
- Janice belongs to a local organization that opposes every new development project in Oakwood.
- Slightly fewer than sixty percent of Oakwood residents support the park proposal.
- Janice has lived in the Oakwood neighborhood for less than a year.
- The proposed park would be located on a parcel of land that currently sits vacant.
- No resident of Oakwood has ever opposed a neighborhood improvement project before.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?