medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Most residents of the Oakwood neighborhood support the proposal to build a new park. Janice lives in Oakwood. Therefore, Janice probably supports the proposal.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
- Janice belongs to a local organization that opposes every new development project in Oakwood.
- Just under sixty percent of all surveyed Oakwood residents back the proposed new park.
- Janice has lived in Oakwood for fewer than twelve months and seldom attends meetings.
- The proposed park would replace a long-vacant parcel that residents say draws litter.
- No Oakwood resident has ever before publicly opposed a neighborhood improvement project of this kind.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ