medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Consider the statement: "No candidate is eligible for the position unless that candidate has at least five years of experience."
Which one of the following is logically equivalent to the statement above?
- If a candidate does not have at least five years of experience, then that candidate is not eligible for the position.
- Some candidates with at least five years of experience are not eligible for the position.
- If a candidate is not eligible for the position, then that candidate must lack five years of experience.
- If a candidate has at least five years of experience, then that candidate is eligible for the position.
- A candidate is eligible for the position if and only if that candidate has at least five years of experience.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?