medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Consider the statement: "No candidate is eligible for the position unless that candidate has at least five years of experience."
Which one of the following is logically equivalent to the statement above?
- If a candidate does not have at least five years of experience, then that candidate is not eligible for the position.
- Some candidates who do have at least five years of relevant experience are nonetheless not eligible for the position.
- If a candidate is not eligible for the position, then that candidate must necessarily lack five years of experience.
- If a candidate has at least five years of experience, then that candidate is thereby eligible for the open position.
- A candidate is eligible for the position if and only if that same candidate has at least five years of experience.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ