hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
At Fenwick Manufacturing, every employee who received a performance bonus last quarter had exceeded their sales quota. Exactly half of the employees who exceeded their sales quota received a performance bonus, and no employee on probationary status received a bonus.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by these statements?
- More than half of the employees who exceeded their sales quota were later moved to probationary status.
- Every employee who failed to exceed the sales quota was placed on probationary status by Fenwick.
- At least one employee who exceeded the sales quota did not receive a performance bonus last quarter.
- The number of employees who received bonuses is identical to the number placed on probation.
- Some employee on probationary status nonetheless exceeded the sales quota last quarter at Fenwick.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?