medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
No riverfront project is both designated a heritage site and approved for expedited construction. Every riverfront project receiving the housing subsidy is either designated a heritage site or reserves at least 40 percent of its units as affordable. Project Q is riverfront, receives the subsidy, and has been approved for expedited construction.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
- Q is not a heritage site because at least 40 percent of its units are affordable.
- Expedited approval is sufficient to make a subsidized riverfront project reserve affordable units.
- Q reserves at least 40 percent of its units as affordable.
- Q received the housing subsidy only because it was approved for expedited construction.
- Q reserves more than 40 percent of its units as affordable because it received expedited approval.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?