medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Every painting from the Orsini workshop contains a geometric underdrawing. Such paintings also contain azurite in the sky layer except during the workshop's final decade, when azurite was unavailable. A panel contains azurite but infrared imaging reveals no geometric underdrawing. Imaging would reveal such an underdrawing even beneath later paint.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
- The panel cannot have been painted during the Orsini workshop's final decade.
- The panel is a final-decade Orsini work whose geometric underdrawing was hidden by later paint.
- The panel was intended to imitate an Orsini painting made before the workshop's final decade.
- The panel's missing geometric underdrawing means that it was not produced by the Orsini workshop.
- The azurite must have been added after the panel left the Orsini workshop.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?