medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Gallery curator: For the upcoming exhibit, the modern sculpture and the abstract painting must be hung in adjacent rooms, though it does not matter which of the two comes first along the visitor's path. The photography collection, however, can be placed in any room.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the curator's statements?
- No room may be placed between the modern sculpture and the abstract painting
- The modern sculpture must come before the abstract painting on the path
- The photography collection must hang next to the sculpture or the painting
- The sculpture and the painting must occupy the very first two rooms of the exhibit
- The photography collection cannot be placed between the sculpture and the painting
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ