medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A university faculty member is eligible for tenure only if they have published a peer-reviewed book and have received excellent teaching evaluations from their students for five consecutive years.
Which one of the following judgments conforms most closely to the principle above?
- A scholar with two published books is refused tenure because their classroom evaluations dipped to merely average in their third year.
- Any teacher with five straight years of strong evaluation scores plus one book is automatically entitled to be granted tenure.
- A researcher who has published three scholarly books is awarded tenure chiefly because that work brought the university wide fame.
- The university grants tenure to a popular, beloved teacher who has published only a handful of short articles in major academic journals.
- A professor holding a peer-reviewed book and five straight years of consistently outstanding evaluations is nonetheless denied tenure by the panel.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ