medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
If you attend the lecture, you will receive a certificate. You did not receive a certificate. Therefore, you did not attend the lecture.
Which one of the following most accurately describes the reasoning above?
- It validly infers the falsity of a sufficient condition from the falsity of its necessary consequence.
- It invalidly infers the absence of the promised consequence from the mere absence of the triggering condition.
- It simply restates one of its own premises as its conclusion, without supplying any genuine support.
- It diverts attention toward a side consideration that is irrelevant to the precise issue at hand.
- It invalidly infers that the triggering condition held from the reported presence of the consequence.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ