medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
While proponents of lab-grown meat point to its potential for reduced land use, skeptics remain concerned about consumer acceptance. However, as production costs continue to drop, the product is becoming increasingly competitive with traditional meat. This price parity will inevitably lead to widespread adoption. Consequently, lab-grown meat will likely be a major part of our future food system.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
- Lab-grown meat is poised to become a substantial component of the food system in the years ahead.
- Once lab-grown meat reaches price parity with conventional meat, broad consumer adoption is bound to follow.
- Lab-grown meat will eventually displace conventional meat entirely as the dominant protein source worldwide.
- Advocates of lab-grown meat emphasize the smaller amount of land its production would require.
- Falling production costs are steadily narrowing the price gap between lab-grown and traditional meat.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ