medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Although the current jury selection process is designed to be impartial, it often results in panels that do not reflect the diversity of the community. This lack of representation can lead to perceptions of unfairness in the legal system. Because public trust is essential for the system to function effectively, we must reform the process to ensure more diverse juries.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
- The jury-selection system needs to be overhauled so that juries better mirror the makeup of their communities.
- When juries fail to represent the community, the legal system may come to be seen as unfair.
- The effective operation of the legal system depends on the confidence of the public.
- The existing jury-selection procedure was created with the aim of being impartial.
- Only by guaranteeing demographically representative juries can the legal system retain any legitimacy at all.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?