easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A city council is debating whether to repair an old bridge or build a completely new road nearby. The council chooses to repair the bridge because, although the new road would be slightly faster for drivers, the bridge is a historic landmark that defines the city's downtown identity.
Which one of the following principles most clearly justifies the council's choice?
- Preserving a place's historical character should outweigh securing a modest improvement in how quickly traffic moves.
- A city council's foremost and overriding obligation in any infrastructure decision is to maximize transportation efficiency.
- A wholly new road should be built only when there is no feasible way at all to repair the existing aging infrastructure.
- A downtown district's historical identity is the single leading determinant of that area's economic prosperity.
- Historic landmarks ought to be preserved at all times, regardless of whatever cost their preservation imposes.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ