easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A restaurant chef decides to source all ingredients from local farms rather than a large international distributor. While the international distributor is cheaper, the chef believes that using local ingredients results in higher quality food and supports the local economy.
Which one of the following principles most clearly justifies the chef's decision?
- Higher quality and benefit to the surrounding community can warrant paying more than the cheapest option would cost.
- Actively backing the local economy is a restaurant's single most effective method of attracting new customers.
- A chef should always buy the least expensive ingredients available so as to protect the restaurant's profit margin.
- Ingredients grown locally are, without exception, of higher quality than those shipped from international suppliers.
- A chef should reject any supplier whose growing practices the chef cannot personally visit and inspect firsthand.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ