easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A restaurant chef decides to source all ingredients from local farms rather than a large international distributor. While the international distributor is cheaper, the chef believes that using local ingredients results in higher quality food and supports the local economy.
Which one of the following principles most clearly justifies the chef's decision?
- Higher quality and benefit to the surrounding community can warrant paying more than the cheapest option would cost.
- Backing the local economy is a restaurant's most effective method of attracting new customers.
- A chef should buy the least expensive ingredients available so as to protect the restaurant's profit.
- Ingredients grown locally are without exception of higher quality than those shipped internationally.
- A chef should reject any supplier whose practices the chef cannot personally inspect.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?