medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A local charity should award a community grant only if the project will directly benefit residents of the neighborhood and the project budget does not exceed five thousand dollars.
Which one of the following situations conforms to the principle stated above?
- A grant is awarded to a three-thousand-dollar project because the founder of the charity is a personal friend of the project leader.
- The charity refuses funding to a four-thousand-dollar plan whose purpose is to bring out-of-state researchers in for a visit to the city.
- A grant is awarded to a project that costs six thousand dollars because it will build a new playground for local children.
- Any project that stays under budget and helps neighbors must be funded by the charity's grant committee.
- A two-thousand-dollar project that directly serves neighborhood residents is denied a grant by the committee.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?