medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning

Which one of the following situations most closely conforms to the principle above?

1. A claim for damage caused by a slow-leaking valve is paid because the homeowner had the plumbing professionally inspected every single year.
2. A claim is paid solely because the water damage was so extensive that the family was forced to vacate and relocate out of their home for months.
3. An insurer rejects a claim arising from a sudden pipe burst because the policyholder had ignored a warning to replace a corroded length of pipe.
4. All claims that involve a burst pipe must be paid in full whenever the homeowner can simply prove they hired a plumber for an annual check-up.
5. A claim from a sudden burst at a diligently maintained home is nonetheless denied even though both of the stated rule conditions are clearly satisfied.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →