hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Wynn: The recent surge in the region's unemployment is a direct result of the factory closures. Xiu: There has been no surge to explain. The figures you are pointing to reflect the ordinary seasonal dip that reverses every winter; measured year over year, the region's unemployment is flat.
Wynn and Xiu disagree over whether
- The region has actually experienced a surge in unemployment
- Factory closures can ever raise unemployment
- whether factory closures caused a similar unemployment pattern in earlier years
- Factories in the region have closed
- The unemployment figures follow a recurring seasonal pattern
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?