hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A nonprofit board has the following eligibility rules: (1) If Henderson serves, then Jacobs cannot serve. (2) If Klein serves, then both Levy and Matsuda must also serve. (3) Ito and Nash cannot both serve at the same time. The board seats exactly four members, drawn from seven candidates: Henderson, Jacobs, Klein, Levy, Matsuda, Ito, and Nash.
If Klein is appointed, how many of the remaining six candidates are necessarily barred from serving on the board?
- Zero
- One
- Two
- Three
- Four
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ