medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
If you are a member of the elite squad, you must have passed the endurance test. You have not passed the endurance test. Therefore, you are not a member of the elite squad.
The argument's reasoning conforms most closely to which one of the following described patterns?
- affirming a sufficient condition to derive the further condition it guarantees
- denying a required condition to conclude that the condition relying on it fails
- denying a sufficient condition to conclude that its guaranteed consequence fails
- chaining two conditionals together to link a first condition through to a third
- concluding a sufficient condition holds because its necessary condition holds too
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ