medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Every student who participated in the mandatory orientation session received a handbook. Since Marco has a handbook, he must have attended the orientation session.
The flawed reasoning above is most similar to that in which one of the following?
- All accepted job applicants are interviewed beforehand. Sarah was interviewed, so she will be accepted.
- Whenever it rains, the grass gets wet. It is raining right now, so the grass is getting wet.
- Most city residents commute by public transit. Maria lives in the city, so she probably commutes by transit.
- No one under 18 may enter the club. Jordan is over 18, so he must be allowed to enter the club.
- Every champion swimmer trains daily. Devon trains daily, but Devon has never won a swimming title.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ