medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
I asked two people on the street what they thought of the new law, and both were against it. Clearly, the entire city opposes the new law.
The flawed reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to the flawed reasoning above?
- Most people I know enjoy coffee. Therefore, most people in the world probably enjoy coffee.
- All three of my previous cars were reliable. Therefore, every car this company makes is reliable.
- The last ten times I threw the ball, it went in the hoop. So, if I throw it again, it will go in.
- Scientific studies show the medication works in ninety percent of cases. Therefore, it will likely work for you.
- Two of my neighbors dislike the mayor, and the mayor recently raised property taxes. So the tax hike is why the city dislikes the mayor.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ