medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Most people who live in the Heights district own a car. Since Julian lives in the Heights district, he probably owns a car.
The reasoning above is most similar in its degree of certainty to which one of the following?
- A majority of registered voters back the proposed bill, so a voter chosen at random is more likely than not to support it.
- Every employee at the firm is strictly required to wear a tailored suit, so Mr. Lee, an employee, is certainly wearing one.
- Some residents of the apartment building keep a household pet, so the next resident to step outside very likely keeps one too.
- Anyone who passes the timed entrance test is hired, and since Samantha passed it last week, she is guaranteed a paid position.
- Only a handful of the district's older homes have private driveways, which is the reason its narrow streets are rarely congested.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ