easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Thornton University's student body participates in community service at a higher rate than any other university in the state. Ramirez is a student at Thornton. Therefore, Ramirez must participate in community service more than any student at any other university.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because it
- assumes that a trait holding for a group as a whole must hold for each member taken individually
- overlooks the genuine possibility that Ramirez is not a representative student at Thornton
- fails to specify what minimum level of activity counts as participating in community service
- presumes that community service is the only valid measure of a student's contribution to society
- concludes that Thornton's students serve more than students at every university in the entire nation
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ