easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The new policy of allowing dogs in the office has caused productivity to increase. Since the policy was introduced, project completion rates have risen by 12 percent.
Which of the following, if true, provides an alternative explanation for the increase in productivity?
- The company rolled out a powerful new project-management platform in the very same week it began allowing dogs.
- Productivity rose by a closely similar amount over the same months at a neighboring firm that does not permit any dogs.
- Most employees who choose to bring their own dogs to work each day report feeling notably calmer and more focused.
- Several staff members who are seriously allergic to dogs have lately begun working from home far more frequently.
- Employees across every department now say, almost unanimously, that they feel happier since the office began permitting dogs.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ