medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The new policy of allowing dogs in the office has caused productivity to increase. Since the policy was introduced, project completion rates have risen by 12 percent.
Which of the following, if true, provides an alternative explanation for the increase in productivity?
- The company rolled out a powerful new project-management platform in the very same week it began allowing dogs.
- Productivity rose by a similar amount at a neighboring firm that does not permit dogs.
- Most employees who bring their dogs to work report feeling calmer and more focused.
- Several employees who are allergic to dogs have begun working from home more frequently.
- Employees overwhelmingly say they are happier now that the office permits dogs.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?