medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Recent data indicates that employees who take their full allotted vacation time are less likely to experience burnout. Therefore, to reduce burnout and improve retention, the company should mandate that all employees take at least two weeks of vacation per year.
Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Two weeks is the precise minimum amount of time a person needs to recover fully from all work-related stress.
- The observed correlation does not arise simply because less-stressed employees are the ones who choose to take vacations.
- No employee would rather receive a cash payout than use their allotted vacation days.
- Improving retention is the single most important objective for the company's human resources team this year.
- Most employees are currently aware of how much vacation time the company allots to them.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?