medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Recent data indicates that employees who take their full allotted vacation time are less likely to experience burnout. Therefore, to reduce burnout and improve retention, the company should mandate that all employees take at least two weeks of vacation per year.
Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Two weeks is the precise biological minimum amount of time a person needs to recover fully from all accumulated work stress.
- The observed correlation does not arise simply because less-stressed employees are the ones who choose to take vacations.
- No employee, given the same option, would rather receive an equivalent cash payout than actually use their allotted vacation days.
- Improving employee retention is the single most important objective for the company's human resources team this fiscal year.
- Most employees are currently fully aware of exactly how much paid vacation time the company allots to them each calendar year.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ