medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
If a law student studies for more than ten hours a day, they will inevitably experience burnout. Sarah did not study for more than ten hours a day. Therefore, Sarah will not experience burnout.
Which one of the following exhibits the same flawed pattern of reasoning as the argument above?
- If a plant is watered daily, it will stay healthy. This plant was not watered daily. So it will not stay healthy.
- If a car's battery is dead, the car will not start. The car started. So the battery is not dead.
- All successful athletes exercise regularly. Mark exercises regularly. So Mark will be a successful athlete.
- Anyone who wins the lottery becomes wealthy. James is wealthy. So James must have won the lottery.
- If a student misses every class, they will fail. This student attended every class. So this student is guaranteed to pass.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ