medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A tech company found that employees who use the company gym take 30 percent fewer sick days than those who do not. To raise overall productivity, the company decided to make gym use mandatory for every employee.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the company's plan?
- The employees who already use the gym on their own are precisely the ones who are most health-conscious to begin with
- The 30 percent reduction in sick days was measured over just a single calendar year rather than several years
- Some employees would simply rather exercise on their own at home than commute to the shared on-site company gym
- Maintaining and properly staffing the gym will grow steadily more expensive as more employees begin to use it daily
- No amount of exercise whatsoever can fully prevent every illness caused by contagious viruses circulating in the office
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ