medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Author: The recent drop in voter turnout is not a sign of apathy but rather a rational response to a lack of meaningful choices. When ballots offer candidates who differ little from one another, staying home is a reasonable reaction rather than a symptom of indifference.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author's argument?
- Surveyed non-voters overwhelmingly report being highly satisfied with the candidates who were available to them
- Several political commentators have publicly praised this year's slate of candidates as unusually distinctive
- A large share of would-be voters describe the official registration process as needlessly slow and complicated
- The number of registered voters under the age of twenty-five has now fallen to an all-time recorded low
- Turnout has fallen even in regions whose ballots offer candidates nearly indistinguishable from one another in their stated positions
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ