medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Over the past year, our company introduced a new wellness program, and employee sick days fell by 15%. Clearly, the wellness program is responsible for the improved attendance.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
- In the same year, the company began penalizing employees for taking sick days, giving them a separate reason to come in.
- The wellness program cost considerably more to run than the company had budgeted for the year, straining its operating funds.
- Most employees who joined the wellness program said they felt noticeably more energetic and alert throughout the workday.
- Many employees said the program's morning yoga sessions were their favorite new perk, easily beating the free coffee bar.
- Aside from the wellness program, the firm adopted no other new initiative that might plausibly explain the year's decline.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ