medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Consider the statement: 'No person who is not a member of the board may attend the closed session.'
Which one of the following is logically equivalent to the contrapositive of that statement?
- Anyone who attends the closed session is a member of the board.
- Anyone not attending the closed session is not a board member.
- Every board member is a person who attends the closed session.
- Every member of the board is required to attend each session.
- Anyone who is not a board member is barred from every meeting.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ