easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Training for a marathon takes months of practice, so a manager concluded that learning a new software program should also take months of practice.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning?
- It treats marathon training and learning new software as if one activity caused the other.
- It rejects a claim by attacking the manager's credibility.
- It treats a claim as true because many managers believe it.
- It assumes marathon training and learning software require the same months of preparation.
- It assumes only two possible training methods exist.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ