easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Watering a plant regularly is necessary for it to grow. Since Mia waters her plant regularly, she concludes it will definitely grow.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning?
- It assumes the conclusion it sets out to prove.
- It treats a necessary condition as if it were sufficient.
- It rejects a claim by attacking the person making it.
- It treats a claim as true because most people believe it.
- It assumes what is true of the parts is true of the whole.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ