easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A famous actor endorsed a new investment app in a commercial, so a listener concluded the app must be a sound financial choice.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning?
- It generalizes from one investor's experience to all investors.
- It assumes only two financial choices are available.
- It assumes that because the actor endorsed the app, the app's soundness must have caused the endorsement.
- It relies on the actor's opinion despite his lacking financial expertise.
- It assumes what is true of each part is true of the whole.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ