medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Although using artificial intelligence in hiring can lead to bias if the training data is flawed, AI can process thousands of applications much faster than human recruiters. This speed allows companies to identify top talent before competitors do. Given that securing top talent is critical for business success, companies should integrate AI into their initial screening processes.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
- Companies ought to build AI into the early, screening stage of their hiring process.
- Landing top talent is, more than any other factor, crucial to whether a business succeeds.
- AI's superior processing speed lets firms spot the best candidates ahead of rivals.
- Whenever its training data is flawed, AI used in hiring can readily produce biased outcomes.
- Companies that adopt AI screening are all but guaranteed to outcompete those that do not.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ