easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
After a café changed its music, sales rose. The owner concludes that the music caused the increase. Scenario 1 contains no additional facts.
Which response best identifies the reasoning problem?
- Other changes could have caused the sales increase.
- a statement that directly contradicts the credited claim
- a broader claim about every similar situation
- a detail unrelated to the speakers or argument
- no conclusion can be drawn
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ