easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The park added lights. Evening visits increased. Therefore, the lights encouraged evening use. Scenario 9 contains no additional facts.
Which statement is the conclusion?
- a statement that directly contradicts the credited claim
- a broader claim about every similar situation
- a detail unrelated to the speakers or argument
- The lights encouraged evening use.
- no conclusion can be drawn
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ