medium · MCAT cars
Passage: The cognitive science of religion (CSR) attempts to explain religious belief as a natural byproduct of the human brain's evolutionary architecture. One prominent theory suggests that humans possess a 'Hyperactive Agency Detection Device' (HADD), which causes us to over-attribute agency to ambiguous events—interpreting a rustle in the bushes as a predator rather than the wind. Proponents argue that this tendency, while prone to false positives, was evolutionarily advantageous. In this view, belief in gods or spirits is an accidental extension of a survival mechanism. Critics argue that CSR 'explains away' religion by reducing it to a cognitive glitch. However, theologians might counter that if a creator intended for humans to find the divine, it is logical that the human brain would be equipped with the biological hardware to do so. The theologians' counter-argument mentioned in the final sentence suggests that CSR research is:
- Potentially supportive of a religious worldview if biological 'hardware' is seen as intentional.
- Fundamentally incompatible with any belief in a purposeful, intentional creator.
- A definitive proof that the Hyperactive Agency Detection Device is nothing more than a cognitive glitch.
- Evidence that religious belief is merely a survival mechanism rather than a divine gift.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More MCAT cars practice
- Which of the following best identifies the conclusion of this argument?
- If the negation of the statement logically undermines the author's conclusion, what does t
- An author argues that 'modern education systems fail because they prioritize rote memoriza
- What can the scientist conclude about the relationship between these variables?
- Which statement accurately describes the statistical interpretation of this finding if the
- Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this finding?
- However, when the data from both clinics are combined, Drug B appears to have a higher ove
- Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?