medium · MCAT cars
Passage: Soren Kierkegaard’s critique of the 'Christendom' of nineteenth-century Denmark was rooted in the distinction between objective knowledge and subjective truth. He argued that the attempt to prove God's existence through logical proofs was a form of spiritual avoidance. For Kierkegaard, faith is not a rational conclusion reached at the end of an argument, but a 'leap' made in the face of the absurd. This leap is necessitated by the absolute qualitative difference between the finite human and the infinite Divine. To 'know' God objectively is impossible; one can only 'relate' to God through a passionate, individual commitment that persists despite intellectual uncertainty. Critics argue that this 'fideism' abandons the mind to irrationality, but Kierkegaard maintains that the true religious life begins only when the safety of reason is surrendered for the sake of an authentic existence before the Absolute.
Which of the following best characterizes Kierkegaard’s view of the relationship between reason and faith?
- Rigorous logical proof can ultimately render the Absolute fully comprehensible to reason.
- Objective proofs assist the seeker but remain insufficient for genuine religious faith.
- Faith requires the abandonment of rational certainty in favor of a personal, committed relationship.
- A secure and lasting faith must be built upon a solid foundation of careful, disciplined reasoning.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More MCAT cars practice
- Which of the following best identifies the conclusion of this argument?
- If the negation of the statement logically undermines the author's conclusion, what does t
- An author argues that 'modern education systems fail because they prioritize rote memoriza
- What can the scientist conclude about the relationship between these variables?
- Which statement accurately describes the statistical interpretation of this finding if the
- Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this finding?
- However, when the data from both clinics are combined, Drug B appears to have a higher ove
- Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?