medium · Project Management Professional hybrid
Thornfield Labs uses a third-party AI tool to automate the generation of activity duration estimates. During a governance audit, it is discovered that the AI consistently underestimated durations by 15%, leading to a significant schedule slip.
Who is ultimately accountable for this failure?
- The AI tool vendor for providing an inaccurate model.
- The project sponsor for authorizing the use of automation in the planning phase.
- The IT department for failing to calibrate the machine learning parameters.
- The project manager for failing to validate the AI output with the project team.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Project Management Professional hybrid practice
- What should the project manager do?
- What is the Scrum Master's primary focus here as a servant leader?
- What should the project manager investigate first?
- What should the project manager do first?
- Which SECI mode is most active?
- What does 'Consulted' mean for the local Community Group in this context?
- Which Mindset Rule is the highest priority?
- Who is traditionally 'Accountable' for the effectiveness of this adaptive ceremony?